[MPEG-OTSPEC] Draft AHG report to WG3

suzuki toshiya mpsuzuki at hiroshima-u.ac.jp
Fri Jan 14 01:13:48 CET 2022


Murata-san,

Should I ask a time for SC34 members to review (and submit a liaison comment) m58948, before the decision to incorporate in the future OFF spec? Do you think about a possibility the proposed update can induce some technical incompatibilities with the earlier edition?

Regards,
mpsuzuki

On 2022/01/14 7:43, MURATA wrote:
> I object the AHG recommendation,
> 
> AHG Recommendations
> The AHG recommends to adopt the proposed updated CFF2 table description and start
> the new work item by creating a Working Draft of the new OFF 5 the edition text that
> would incorporate two prior amendments and newly proposed changes.
> 
> I do not see consensus here.
> 
> Regards,
> Makoto
> 
> 2022年1月14日(金) 2:30 Vladimir Levantovsky <vladimir.levantovsky at gmail.com<mailto:vladimir.levantovsky at gmail.com>>:
> Dear AHG members,
> 
> Please see attached for your review the draft text of the AHG report I plan to send to the WG3 for presentation at the upcoming meeting next week. Your comments are appreciated.
> 
> Thank you,
> Vladimir
> 
> _______________________________________________
> mpeg-otspec mailing list
> mpeg-otspec at lists.aau.at<mailto:mpeg-otspec at lists.aau.at>
> https://lists.aau.at/mailman/listinfo/mpeg-otspec
> 
> 
> --
>   --
> 慶應義塾大学政策・メディア研究科特任教授
> 村田 真
> 


More information about the mpeg-otspec mailing list