[MPEG-OTSPEC] Draft AHG report to WG3
suzuki toshiya
mpsuzuki at hiroshima-u.ac.jp
Fri Jan 14 01:13:48 CET 2022
Murata-san,
Should I ask a time for SC34 members to review (and submit a liaison comment) m58948, before the decision to incorporate in the future OFF spec? Do you think about a possibility the proposed update can induce some technical incompatibilities with the earlier edition?
Regards,
mpsuzuki
On 2022/01/14 7:43, MURATA wrote:
> I object the AHG recommendation,
>
> AHG Recommendations
> The AHG recommends to adopt the proposed updated CFF2 table description and start
> the new work item by creating a Working Draft of the new OFF 5 the edition text that
> would incorporate two prior amendments and newly proposed changes.
>
> I do not see consensus here.
>
> Regards,
> Makoto
>
> 2022年1月14日(金) 2:30 Vladimir Levantovsky <vladimir.levantovsky at gmail.com<mailto:vladimir.levantovsky at gmail.com>>:
> Dear AHG members,
>
> Please see attached for your review the draft text of the AHG report I plan to send to the WG3 for presentation at the upcoming meeting next week. Your comments are appreciated.
>
> Thank you,
> Vladimir
>
> _______________________________________________
> mpeg-otspec mailing list
> mpeg-otspec at lists.aau.at<mailto:mpeg-otspec at lists.aau.at>
> https://lists.aau.at/mailman/listinfo/mpeg-otspec
>
>
> --
> --
> 慶應義塾大学政策・メディア研究科特任教授
> 村田 真
>
More information about the mpeg-otspec
mailing list