[MPEG-OTSPEC] Some thoughts on the "under consideration" proposals
kanou
kanou at iwatafont.co.jp
Wed Jul 5 12:34:30 CEST 2023
Dear Sir,
I welcome the proposal of >64K expansion in Boring Expansion proposal as an engineer
of a Japanese font vender, but I need a quick and backward-compatible solution for my friends
working on Chinese classics and handling >64K text every day.
I propose a temporary solution that a font collection file including fonts with names like
BaseFontName#1
BaseFontName#2
...
which shares the common base font name and each font in the collection has numbered suffix
can be treated as if there is a single font file named BaseFontName and application programs
aware of this convention can display a single BaseFontName instead of suffixed font names.
The full text of my proposal is here:
https://1drv.ms/b/s!AmmL2QlEO2bqgRnSjsUQM1vhjKcY?e=ylfh3J <https://1drv.ms/b/s!AmmL2QlEO2bqgRnSjsUQM1vhjKcY?e=ylfh3J>
Regards,
--
Hiroki Kanou <kanou at iwatafont.co.jp <mailto:kanou at iwatafont.co.jp>>
Iwata Corporation
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.aau.at/mailman/private/mpeg-otspec/attachments/20230705/8871d322/attachment.html>
More information about the mpeg-otspec
mailing list