[MPEG-OTSPEC] Who's coming to the SC29 meeting in Sapporo in July?

[Vladimir Levantovsky]

The minimum / default CD comment period is 8 weeks. It can be increased,
and the WG3 resolutions (see N1181) state:
"3.5.2 The WG 03 recommends issuing 3-month ballot of ISO/IEC CD 14496-22
5th edition."

Vladimir


On Wed, May 15, 2024 at 6:32 AM MURATA via mpeg-otspec <
mpeg-otspec at lists.aau.at> wrote:

> Dear colleagues,
>
> ISO/IEC Directives, Part 1 was changed recently.  The comment submission
> period is now +8 weeks.  For more about this, see 2.5 of this document.
>
>
> https://www.iso.org/sites/directives/current/consolidated/index.html#_Toc165304990
>
> Regards,
> Makoto
>
> 2024年5月9日(木) 23:35 Vladimir Levantovsky via mpeg-otspec <
> mpeg-otspec at lists.aau.at>:
>
>> It’s hard to pinpoint the exact future date for the CD ballot.
>> There are still quite a few changes that need to be made in the current
>> draft document, and once the text is complete and ready, I am not sure how
>> long it would take for SC29 Secretariat to issue a ballot. Once issued, it
>> will be +12 weeks from the issue date for comments submission period.
>>
>> Thank you,
>> Vladimir
>>
>> On May 8, 2024, at 7:02 PM, 木田泰夫 <kida at mac.com> wrote:
>>
>> 
>> Hello Vladimir,
>>
>> Thank you so much for explaining the process. Since there will not be any
>> activities related to fonts, it seems that attending might not be very
>> beneficial for me.
>>
>> Could you please clarify when the CD ballot will be issued?
>>
>> Best regards,
>> Kida
>>
>> 2024/05/09 5:40、Vladimir Levantovsky <vladimir.levantovsky at gmail.com
>> >のメール:
>>
>> 
>> Dear Kida-san,
>>
>> I may attend the MPEG meeting in Sapporo, but I am not sure if we have
>> any formal Font Activity discussions there. The current Working Draft has
>> been promoted to the Committee Draft at the last meeting [in the end of
>> April], and I asked the SC29 Secretariat to allow an extended 3-months
>> period for comments when the CD ballot is issued. Therefore, the ballot
>> results and comments will not be available by July, and the WG is
>> prohibited to conduct any discussions related to documents under ballot.
>>
>> Attending the SC29 WG meetings in July may still be a valuable experience
>> for you, but I just wanted to make sure we are on the same page w.r.t.
>> expectations of what can or cannot be discussed there.
>>
>> Thank you,
>> Vladimir
>>
>>
>> On Wed, May 8, 2024 at 1:24 AM 木田泰夫 via mpeg-otspec <
>> mpeg-otspec at lists.aau.at> wrote:
>>
>>> Hello everyone,
>>>
>>> Is anyone planning to physically come to the SC29 meeting in Sapporo,
>>> Japan in July? We, the AHG participants from Japan, are trying to decide if
>>> we should attend too. Let us know if you're coming!
>>>
>>> - kida
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> mpeg-otspec mailing list
>>> mpeg-otspec at lists.aau.at
>>> https://lists.aau.at/mailman/listinfo/mpeg-otspec
>>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> mpeg-otspec mailing list
>> mpeg-otspec at lists.aau.at
>> https://lists.aau.at/mailman/listinfo/mpeg-otspec
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> mpeg-otspec mailing list
>> mpeg-otspec at lists.aau.at
>> https://lists.aau.at/mailman/listinfo/mpeg-otspec
>>
>
>
> --
>  --
> 慶應義塾大学政策・メディア研究科特任教授
> 村田 真
> _______________________________________________
> mpeg-otspec mailing list
> mpeg-otspec at lists.aau.at
> https://lists.aau.at/mailman/listinfo/mpeg-otspec
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.aau.at/pipermail/mpeg-otspec/attachments/20240515/39d7fd13/attachment.htm>